翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ A Rock Star Bucks a Coffee Shop
・ A Rockapella Holiday
・ A Random Walk Down Wall Street
・ A Rank Outsider
・ A Rank Outsider (album)
・ A Rank Outsider (film)
・ A Rap on Race
・ A Rape in Cyberspace
・ A Rape on Campus
・ A Rare Bird
・ A Rare Conundrum
・ A Rather Blustery Day
・ A Rather English Marriage
・ A rationibus
・ A Ray of Light
A Reader's Manifesto
・ A Real American Hero (film)
・ A Real Basket Case
・ A Real Birmingham Family
・ A Real Dead One
・ A Real Diamond in the Rough
・ A Real Dope Thing
・ A Real Fine Place to Start
・ A Real Live Dead One
・ A Real Live Dolly
・ A Real Live One
・ A Real Man
・ A Real Partnership
・ A Real Swedish Live Show
・ A Real Young Girl


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

A Reader's Manifesto : ウィキペディア英語版
A Reader's Manifesto

''A Reader's Manifesto'' is a 2002 book written by B. R. Myers that was originally published in heavily edited form in the July/August 2001 issue of ''The Atlantic Monthly'' magazine. Myers criticizes the high status of literary fiction compared to genre fiction; he finds literary fiction full of affectations and pretentious wordplay but lacking in strong storytelling.
== Description ==
Myers described the original article, which saw no end of responses from admirers and critics, as "a light-hearted polemic" about modern literature. Myers was particularly concerned with what he saw as the growing pretentiousness of American literary fiction. He was skeptical about the value of elaborate, allusive prose and argued that what was praised as good writing was in fact the epitome of bad writing. His critique concentrated on E. Annie Proulx, Cormac McCarthy, Paul Auster, David Guterson, and Don DeLillo, all of whom enjoyed substantial acclaim from the literary establishment.〔Regarding the literary establishment, see Judith Shulevitz's article "(Fiction and 'Literary' Fiction )." ''The New York Times'', September 9, 2001.〕 Myers directed many of his harshest charges at literary critics for prestigious publications such as the ''New York Times Book Review'', whom he accused of lavishing praise upon bad writing either for political reasons, or because they did not understand it and therefore assumed it to have great artistic merit. Myers also focuses on what he calls "the cult of the sentence", criticizing critics for pulling single sentences out of novels in order to praise their brilliance, while ignoring shortcomings in the novel as a whole.
Myers' article attracted heated criticism from aficionados of American literary fiction, especially of the authors Myers mentioned by name. Some critics charged Myers with being selective in his choice of targets, and of cherry picking particularly unreadable passages from the authors' works to make his point. However, Myers used only previously quoted and critically praised passages in an attempt to avoid that criticism.
Myers suggests there are only three possible responses when a critic is asked to review a work of literature:
1. “Praise the novel and novelist.”
2. “Lament that novel is unworthy of novelist’s huge talent (still praise it )."
3. “Review someone else’s novel instead.”
In Myers' view, critics have created a system of self-serving criticism which protects, embraces, and aids certain authors.
For many critics, Myers was continuing the popular comments on postmodernism, of which John Gardner (''On Moral Fiction'') was the most recent proponent.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「A Reader's Manifesto」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.